Hacker News Reader

Comment by donpott | Hacker News Reader

Maybe a "[1975]" tag is in order, to better indicate that it doesn't refer to current events?

Wow. This was written before Afghanistan and Ukraine? That is uncanny; this might as well could've been written in part about the Taliban insurgency.

I guess in 1975 it would be around the longest break Afghanistan had, from being invaded by superpowers (~100 years since the British, Soviets about to do their thing).

My bad, I should've been more careful.

Not at all, thanks for considering it :)

Yeah, thanks for amending this 1975 date. It made it all the more interesting. Still only half way through but this is a great analysis by Andrew Mack.

So, it leans heavily on Vietnam for its arguments as it was written before Afghanistan (a fail for the Russians and Allies).

What I'm getting is a combination of two factors in conventional asymmetrical conflict;

1) For the superior force, not winning is basically losing

2) There's a sort of "Overton window" for winning, after which you lose at home, politically.

Vietnam played out at home via television and newspapers. The US tried to avoid that mistake during Iraq-I by massively managing the news media and images. Iraq-I happened on CNN and was carefully scripted. Even now we're only just getting documentary accounts of how it really went over there, things that surprise even those who served.

Putin is trying that. But in the internet age I think it's failing.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com