The Maya, and the maize that sustained them, had surprising southern roots | Hacker News Reader

The Maya, and the maize that sustained them, had surprising southern roots

science.org

64 pointsdiodorus10 comments

David Graeber and Wengrow cover this extensively in the fascinating book "The Dawn of Everything" where they discuss evidence for huge trade/exchange networks existing across North and Central America. There was an ancient city in Poverty Point, Louisiana, constructed using what can only be fairly sophisticated mathematical knowledge, the same which is known to have been used in other sites in Central America. And collections of materials and objects have been found that must have been brought over distances of thousands of kilometres. All this while there being no evidence for anything that looks like modern "civilisation" or hierarchical social structure.

You saw this in Bronze Age Europe as well with trade happening between the people in Europe and the Middle East.

Yes, though the distinction they want to get at is that the example at Poverty Point didn't have what we would usually refer to as a settled agrarian society with the usual social relations we know from the European examples. Though they do mention one similar "city" in Turkey called Göbekli Tepe which also seemed to form without the usual traits of civilisation.

To anyone interested in these topics I highly recommend the BBC series Lost Kingdoms of Central America [0]. There is also Lost Kingdoms of South America [1] which is well worth watching.

Amongst other things, they talk about the Milpa/Three Sisters [2] methods of planting crops to ensure that you meet all of your dietary requirements.

[0] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4058292

[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2646312

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Sisters_(agriculture)

An unexpected thing I learned in a recent dive into learning how to make Tamales:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixtamalization

This complicated process of preparing maize makes more nutrients bioavailable.

The Aztecs figured it out somehow.

I learned about this when trying to buy maize flour and discovering that there are 2 types: nixtamalized and non.

Reminds me of how certain South American indigenous tribes have this very complicated ritual to prepare Cassava/Tapioca. They didn't know it, but it removes cyanide and makes it much safer to consume (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48859333 ).

> Reminds me of how certain South American indigenous tribes have this very complicated ritual to prepare Cassava. They didn't know it, but it removes cyanide and makes Cassava way safer to consume.

This is basically how a lot of modern experimental science still works. Sort of black/grey box scientific reasoning.

We have better theories, and better instruments for verifying those theories, but in the end? A bunch of people have high failure rates, but one guy's thing always works. You go over and ask that guy why his always works. He shows you his process and you are hopefully able to ape him. This knowledge is crystallized and handed down. Perhaps even formalized and written up if it's important enough, but often not.

There's a word in tech for people who are good at this sort of "grey/black box observe the world and make it work without really knowing why" skillset. That word is hacking.

Yeah, I'm a bit confused about modern time versus the (unscientific) past. Because people trying stuff and keeping what works is not far from scientific process. It's blind and primitive but structurally too similar to ignore.

There's also something nicer about the past, they could only focus on important ideas to share and save. People had direct interactions with life critical knowledge. I find that better than the current system where science is a far away field that people only see materialize as shiny devices.

The cost of progress is specialization. I can't even keep up with everything in my own subfield.

There are enormous scientific enterprises dedicated to diseases that will never touch my life and mean nothing to me, but constitute actual miracles to another community.

Yes, there was a great podcast with the Electrochemical Society's Doron Aurbach. A very senior scientist, who has been working with lithium batteries. Basically the labs all over the world need to test all the possible combinations. And there are so many of them.

That's why sharing your results is so important.

Too bad it was in Soundcloud and it's been removed: https://www.electrochem.org/ecsnews/doron-aurbach-commercial...

Absent a reason, the only path to WHICH thing fixes some problem in food is to do ALL OF THEM, maybe suffer some nutritional deficiency from washing the good stuff out with the polysacceride poison, and then very carefully experiment with removing one treatment at a time.

Which would butt hurt if it took BOTH heat AND acid to do the thing (tm)

Survival guides for 'crashed in the rainforest' have instructions which pretty much is "do all of it. pound it, wash it, drain it, look at the bubbles, if fish die in the water its pretty toxic, dry it, cook it, taste a tiny bit, wait until the dysentery passes, try again..."

Reply on news.ycombinator.com