Those who readily believe what they are told are easily taken advantage of.

While we are on the topic of epistemic integrity, do you not consider it harmful to make a judgment of psychopathy "from the little I know about you," based on a few UTF-8 characters sent over the web?

Had you any actual knowledge of what it is you speak of, you would have known that:

    The potential for harm is considerable if the PCL-R is used incorrectly, or if the user is not familiar with the clinical and empirical literature pertaining to psychopathy

from the author of the PCL-R [1], "gold standard" for assessing psychopathy (by your own citation [2]).

Why is it that the most morally outraged are the ones most incapable of following their own principles? Doesn't HN rely on people not spreading unreliable misinformation, unlike yourself?

[1] http://www.hare.org/scales/pclr.html

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#Diagnosis