heyo, thanks for the ping
I'm the dev lead on pg_graphql. Happy to answer any questions!
I'm the dev lead on pg_graphql. Happy to answer any questions!
Postgraphile uses a naming convention for postgres functions to extend the GraphQL schema [1].
Do you have any plans to support a similar mechanism in pg_graphql?
Yes, we currently support extending table types via functions using a naming convention. The docs for that feature are available here https://supabase.github.io/pg_graphql/computed_fields/#exten...
It's also on the near-term roadmap to implement custom mutations from user defined functions, similar to postgraphile
Have you considered any other implementation strategies (C native extension, any other pl/* or maybe running an out of PostgreSQL process which does GraphQL to SQL compilation)?
We haven't decided to go that route yet but its been incredibly easy to work with & I'm psyched about what options it could open up like:
- Stateless requests (no schema cache)
- Subscriptions (via a background worker)