They didn't release the source code as required by AGPL and pretended to have built it from scratch initially and defederated from the rest of the network.
On top of that, so basing on 'free and open source software' and even giving attribution now means 'you haven't built anything novel or interesting'. Oh dear.
> the just copy/pasted another project and expect people to take them seriously as a major social network.
Yeah, surely Mastodon by itself has hundreds of millions of users worldwide since launch day right? /s
I never knew that a controlled launch, only in the US with a waitlist already means 'it is over' or 'it is failing' /s I guess it depends on the 'sources' one reads.
If this company did not have their current political affiliations, I seriously doubt you'd be defending them for a second. Because all the evidence of how well they are performing points to them being laughably inept.
Mastodon, despite being an 'alternative' hardly anyone cared about it.
Not even the general public cared either for 6 years until Team Orange came along and used it. They'll probably surpass the amount of users on Mastodon regardless away.
> If this company did not have their current political affiliations, I seriously doubt you'd be defending them for a second. Because all the evidence of how well they are performing points to them being laughably inept.
So now you are a fortune teller and somehow 'launch day disasters' are indicative of future performance isn't it?
Who cares?
You haven't answered any of my questions have you? Only still obsessed around the orange man.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_Social
https://mashable.com/article/truth-social-downloads-drop-don...