It's bizarre and hilarious to me how much you're defending a company that has raised $1 billion dollars promising to create one of the greatest social networks on earth - yet the core of their product is a re-skinned open source project (that originally violated the license) and their execution has been incredibly sloppy (wait lists that people have been on for months, 404 error pages when people link publicly to their profiles).

If this company did not have their current political affiliations, I seriously doubt you'd be defending them for a second. Because all the evidence of how well they are performing points to them being laughably inept.