The count of peer reviewed studies showing a benefit for the use of Ivermectin is now 62, and they can be found here:
The earlier the better of course, just like Tamiflu. The best results were attained when Ivermectin was used as a prophylactic.
The earlier the better of course, just like Tamiflu. The best results were attained when Ivermectin was used as a prophylactic.
>Ivermectin doesn’t reduce mortality in COVID a significant amount (let’s say d > 0.3) in the absence of comorbid parasites: 85-90% confidence
> As we’ve previously discussed, IVM Meta has some curious traits: it resolves to the same IP address as hcqmeta.com as well as c19legacy.com. HCQMeta uses the same kind of purported real time meta analysis to recommend for the use of hydroxychloroquine. C19 legacy has claimed to count the “unnecessary” deaths caused by doctors not using hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin to treat COVID-19. All of these sites refer physicians to the FLCCC for “treatment protocols” and also promote the World Council for Health, a faux public health consortium that’s made up solely of ivermectin advocacy groups.