> Both can be understood as interventions
And both are wrong.
> but they are not equivalent
And still, both are wrong.
And both are wrong.
> but they are not equivalent
And still, both are wrong.
> I agree that discussing who should and should not be in the government of an independent state is wrong.
But annexing a piece of land is just on a completely different level.
There is no equivalency and you should not be trying to create it.
There's also no equivalency between a serial killer who killed 10 people and a serial killer who killed 100 people.
> and you should not be trying to create it
I'm not trying to create any equivalency. But if these two serial killers are fighting each other to death, may I please be excused from rooting for one of them?