No he doesn't. He can also opt to continue being exactly the brand that he is, remain firmly in the startup game, same push back against the self-appointed "social police", who only get away with their "policing" because people usually roll over.
The cancel culture boogeyman generally doesn't destroy lives, which makes one wonder why people like PG feel it so important that they need to write essays decrying it.
Since only people with wealth and privilege are in a position to denounce it, they must have questionable ulterior motives?
You argue dishonestly and incoherently.
See what is the response.
I don’t think that’s true as there are many examples of people’s loves being destroyed, mainly through careers ended. For example, Nobel-prize winning scientist Tim Hunt [0]. He’s famous and lost his job, for saying something stupid.
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2015/6/11/8764901/tim-hunt-sexist-r...