Relying on the classic joke “you said you’d sleep with them for $x million, so we’ve established what you are in principle and now we’re just bargaining over price” as the the arguments for libertarian views is not going to persuade anyone but the choir. Especially when the $x million that gets the first “sure” is not just a larger amount of the same thing, but different like as an extreme example: “would your do xyx if it stopped earth being destroyed by an asteroid, yes? Then we established you’re for xyz in principle”
Once again, back to my repeated observation about why libertarian arguments are not taken seriously, they literally are the form of a classic joke. It would be easy to make the same flawed arguments against anything, including libertarian views but I’m not going to make flawed arguments like that because they always backfire. For example in this comment chain, that reasoning has made libertarianism look like its build on a bad logic and rotten foundations