I was hoping to get some insider scoop on the Samsungs culture problem. But looks like it’s just a round up of Samsungs bad results rather than specific tales of toxicity or culture issues. I don’t doubt it for one second that there are toxicity issues but I also found some of the sources don’t support what they are alledging.

> These various units are allegedly playing the blame game with each other. Samsung LSI (design) is blaming Samsung Foundry, while Samsung Mobile is blaming S.LSI.

The link in this paragraph doesn’t actually have anything about them blaming each other.

> that the foundry is even allegedly lying about the yields

The link here also doesn’t say anything about “lying”. It says they will do a diagnosis/audit around the low yield problem.

I didn’t bother clicking on all the links. But some links are right but kinda erodes the trust in the article when this is happening.