the answer is verdana, but they didnt test it.
I dont think this study is well done. Fonts are learned over time, and people's performance will improve, but differently. There's definitely certain fonts that are optimal.
I dont think this study is well done. Fonts are learned over time, and people's performance will improve, but differently. There's definitely certain fonts that are optimal.
> 3 fonts were actually better for older users than for younger users: Garamond, Montserrat, and Poynter Gothic. The remaining 13 fonts were better for younger users than for older users, which is to be expected, given that younger users generally performed better in the study.
They kinda did touch on it. From what I can see, letter sizing and kerning looks to make more of a difference.
At least they tested their theories. Do you have a 'well done' study that supports the claims above?