What lurks in a drowned forest in Alabama
nautil.us
nautil.us
As a result, there are technology farms that harvest technologies developed in the simulated universes (rather than invent their own).
How we harvest nature's "technology" reminds me of this.
https://www.google.com/search?q=wistmans+wood&rlz=1C1ONGR_en...
In 2019 the fuel pipeline supplying our largest airport was cut by a Digger being allegedly used to dig up ancient wood (Swamp Kauri).
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/news/marsden-pt...
Hopefully these ancient forests do not end up being mined.
However, I think we are beyond that now. I don't know if there really has been a clinically relevant antibiotic with actual use in the real world discovered in the last 20 years in such circumstances.
Now, most antibiotic development is based on knowledge of chemistry/biochemistry and understanding resistance mechanisms.
And looking at "natural" antibiotics, many of even the effective ones have very bad toxicity profiles (see streptomycin and kidney and ear toxicity) or have resistance quickly develop (see penicillin).
Although not an antibiotic, it is interesting that the most effective Covid treatments were not ones discovered in nature (for example Ivermectin and quinine), but rather the vaccine, engineered with mRNA precisely targeting the spike protein which was known through sequencing and protein folding analysis.
Although we should conserve the diversity of our natural world, I don't think that new antibiotics are one of the major reasons to do so.
I don't know if there really has been a clinically relevant
antibiotic with actual use in the real world discovered in
the last 20 years in such circumstances.
It's difficult to know if this is because we've exhausted nature's supply of antibiotics, or if we haven't found any because we haven't been looking.Over the past 10-20 years there have been many articles about how pharma companies have largely abandoned the quest for better antibiotics in favor of more profitable lines of medicine.
As a total outsider, I have no way to judge which one is true.
IMO, the main reason is IP law. You can't patent a natural phenomenon so there is no incentive for companies to go looking for drugs out in nature. There might be a huge societal upside but there is basically no profitability.