> I'm not fond of this framing, which suggests that go is for bad programmers and rust is for good programmers.

Right, go is for inexperienced programmers.

> The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researchers. They’re typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. They’re not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software.

Or so Rob Pike thinks. However, as I get more and more experienced, the shortcomings of go become too much to bear.