Like I said - there are no logically valid arguments for abortion ban, other than strictly religious.
We put mothers and mostly fathers in prison for not providing child support. The latter never even had an option to abort their parental responsibilities the way mothers did during pregnancy. The idea that a non-religious argument against abortion can't exist in light of this is absurd.
>>Like I said - there are no logically valid arguments for abortion ban, other than strictly religious.
Like I said, believing abortion should be prohibited can be an entirely secular belief, your dogmatic denial notwithstanding.
As for child support - again, nothing to do with bodily autonomy, because the same happens in other directions, for failing to support other family members one is required to, not just one’s children.
You still hadn’t managed to provide even a single secular reason to ban abortion. It’s not that they cannot exist - they perhaps could, but they don’t. “Prevailing legal norms” don’t matter, because they have been largely written to the tune of religious extremists; that’s where churches numerous privileges come from.