member state departments that are under its sole control are still funded by national budgets
the 2% is just the head of the snake
member state departments that are under its sole control are still funded by national budgets
the 2% is just the head of the snake
While the US federal government spends over $20 trillion a year. This isn't comparable at any level - regardless of any snake-anatomy analogy.
I'm not sure what your definition of a "member state department" is? But knowing something of the political set-up in a number of EU countries, none are under the "sole control" of the EU (commission I guess you mean?).
[1] https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/eu-budget/eu-budget-added...
Meaning the EU will pass a law or regulation or program that the member states then have to fund with domestic taxes?
Generally speaking for the federal government, if they want to pass a program or requirement the federal government must also pay for that, for example the federal government could not require the state governments to put in bike lane on all road with out giving the states the money to do it.
That is why the Federal government is so large..
Also defense spending, We actually honor our NATO treaty by spending no less than 3% of our GDP on national defense, something the EU nations never do
whereas the EU member state equivalents that implement EU policy get attributed to national budgets
the EU doesn't fund enforcement of the GDPR, the national information commissioners do
not having to pay to implement its policies makes the EU look many, many times more efficient than it actually is