> Well no the difference here is that my example has nothing copied either. Your example has something copied. They are not analogous as they lack that similarity.

Okay, then just tweak my analogy slightly and sell a piece of paper printed with the URL to a photograph of the Mona Lisa, or to an image of a piece of digital artwork, or to a digital audio file, etc.

> The person selling this NFT that contains no copy does not have to misrepresent anything. Hence no fraud. The contract address is obviously different.

If you're defining it as not fraudulent and not copying anything, then what's absurd about the situation at all? It might be amusing that someone might buy something that you personally don't value at all, but that's hardly unique to NFTs.