> All we need is to sink down russian ships in Black sea.
Yeah, I'm sure nuclear war will be good for food pirces.
Yeah, I'm sure nuclear war will be good for food pirces.
Most of it is bluff. Which like any bluff is scary to call bluff. Russian army is in corrupt disarray and even tacticals nukes are not guranteed to work. He will probably be disobeyed by his staff.
Speaking of ships, the flaghsip of Black Sea Fleet Moskva was sunk by Ukrainians. Putin was reportedly enraged but didn't do a thing besides all atrocities he's already doing. Russian media covered it up for domestic audience.
They can sink all of them. He won't nuke anyone. He knows it's a bet on his system he can not afford.
You don't know that and I don't want to risk that. Don't be arrogant. Everyone said his buildup on Ukraine a bluff. It wasn't. I don't think we should ever trust people like you again.
> Russian army is in corrupt disarray and even tacticals nukes are not guranteed to work. He will probably be disobeyed by his staff.
Yet still winning...
> Speaking of ships, the flaghsip of Black Sea Fleet Moskva was sunk by Ukrainians. Putin was reportedly enraged but didn't do a thing besides all atrocities he's already doing. Russian media covered it up for domestic audience.
Ukraine doing that and the US doing that are drastically different. If you don't understand that then you're definitely not worth listening to on this.
Because Germans do not provide weapons they've promised. In fact if they drag their feet more, war may change its course.
> Ukraine doing that and the US doing that are drastically different
Of course Ukrainians can do that if they're equipped with enough modern weapons and intelligence.
The problem is stated above. Germans do not provide weapons, Biden is slow to push them. Additionally because of its energy and political dependence on Russia Germany is pushing Ukraine to surrender territory (along with wheat and ports) to Russia.
We don't need direct US involvement, we need strong and decisive leadership.
No, most Western intelligence services were saying the invasion is going to happen. It was Putin-supporters like you, who claimed that it is Western warmongering and nothing will happen.
Can you stop with these accusations? Not everyone that disagrees with your warmongering supports the other warmongers.
On top of that, you're accusing people of being arrogant and dismissive and whatever else.
I didn't say this or believe this.
> it is all NATO's fault
I didn't say this or believe this.
> People who want help Ukraine defend itself are "warmongers"
I didn't say this or believe this.
As for the rest, I'm not sure what problem you have with the truth and someone who has a different risk assessment than you. And yeah, you're literally dismissing facts with references with ad hominem attacks.
Russians only respect strength. The situation could have been escalated much further without tipping over into nuclear exchange. Nato failed, and now we have a multitude of security issues.
Sadly, Germany, Austria, and Hungary have forgotten just how bad Russians are. I wonder what the oldest generation (especially women) think of the current crisis.
But the Russians are bullies and cowards. They will not dare touch anything NATO.
Also, the whole Black Sea Fleet is in hiding behind Crimea ever since Ukraine showed Neptune missiles work well, and got bunch of Harpoons to back it up.
Easy for you to say (presumably either because you're not in danger of getting nuked, or don't care about getting nuked), but I doubt most people hold that view.