if the content of the article was not heresy and instead came from some trusted scientific authority, this would not be the case.
if the content of the article was not heresy and instead came from some trusted scientific authority, this would not be the case.
The people who are working on COVID are too fucking busy to waste their time arguing with kooks who claim they are rational.
So I worded it more diplomatically, or ambiguously.
Shame; it’s interesting to get challenged. At least I got to read it before it got flushed.
One might think a site dedicated to intellectual curiousity would be interested in stories like that, or that at least flagging such stories would be penalized, but no.
Wonder if this phenomenon is discussed with dang et al. I am very motivated to find the truth whereever the search takes me, so encountering this kind of collectivist censorship is very frustrating.