(Regoogling that second figure returns some ranges as low as 1-2 lb/lb, which would put junk mail at like 0.2-0.4 crypto.)
The error bars all overlap, so the closest I can do with the level of work I'm willing to put in is that junk mail might be a little bit more CO2 than cryptocurrency (or twice as much as Bitcoin), or like 5% of cryptocurrency at the other extreme.
Personally, I'm convinced that the recycling system as a whole requires a certain base amount of input material to even function and that junk mail serves a useful purpose by providing a good portion of that base amount of input material.
This is a four year old article and Edmonton hasn't changed the recycling system at all. It's still blue bags that get tossed into a truck, compacted, and presumably nothing useful happens.
On the garbage side, we now have bins that can be emptied by an arm on a truck and we separate garbage from organics. The organic material apparently gets composted, but I'm not sure what happens after that.
[0] https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/its-not-worth-it...
Wood pulp and recycled pulp are both in incredibly high demand at the moment and both incredibly cheap to use.
I can't speak for global stats, but here in England, as of 2018, we were importing over $600 million of just recycled paper to use from abroad! [ https://www.statista.com/statistics/490038/eu27-import-value... ]
> AF&PA and Industry Partners Aim to Set the Record Straight – Pizza Boxes Are Recyclable, Grease and Cheese Not an Issue
https://www.afandpa.org/news/2020/afpa-and-industry-partners...