Your objection to a perfectly cromulent answer is just namecalling. People take apart and find vulnerabilities, including cryptographic ones in closed source software all the time.
This just isn't true. It's a claim trivially disproved in public by, say, gazillions of detailed P0 posts. Again, all you have is namecalling and confidently stated things with obvious counter-examples.
Claiming otherwise is ridiculous.
Yours is an extraordinary claim that requires, never mind extraordinary, any evidence.