Hacker News Reader

Comment by thrtythreeforty | Hacker News Reader

I feel like AWS has a pretty good track record at this point for not increasing prices - certainly to the point that I trust them not to pull an Oracle. (Hypothetically, my volume of data stored with them is low enough that even a 10x gouge would just make me angry, not wound me financially. There's not a mechanism for these archives to incur explosive costs, but your point is why I avoid other less-predictable cloud services.)

View on HN

Don’t be silly. It’s a game theoretic certainty that they will indeed pull an Oracle.

There's no need to act condescending or call people names ("silly"). A 15 year track record and a public commitment aren't things you can hand wave away.

I'd also point out there's no substance behind your "game theoretic" jargon.

The parent put it too strongly but it's equally naive to assume that track records and public commitments mean anything to a privately-held company, with a commitment to profit shareholders, run by Jeff Bezos.

I can’t believe this needs to be spelled out.

Of course AWS needs to make money.

Of course they make more money in the short term if they raise prices.

Of course this affects their long term revenue and profitability because customers are afraid that prices of any of the products they use could rise.

Say whatever you want about Amazon, but they have never been a company that cares about the short term. They care about profits for the next 20 years, not Q3 2022.

You’re calling me/my views naive? Seriously? Just after I excoriated someone for name calling?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com