Hacker News Reader

Only the first one you mention (a task to be solved in real time with both the interviewer and the candidate on the same video call) is the only one that respects the candidate's time. The other ones do not. A take home assignment could mean hours or days of effort for the candidate, while it may take at most 1h or so for the interviewer to review it. Totally asymmetric.

View on HN

I've done take home tasks before. One of them I had to do landed me a job at a really great company that I'm happy I didn't miss.

I agree it's maybe a little less respectful of a candidate's time, but as long as it's not too big a task I don't think it's unreasonable either.

I think it depends on the perspective (and the state of the market): two scenarios a) "candidates are willing to work for companies, therefore companies have a bit more of control over the whole interview process", and b) "companies are looking for (scarce) good talent out there, therefore candidates have a bit more of control over the whole interview process".

When I was a junior developer I used to deal with a). Now that I have more years of experience I usually deal with b).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com