It's the same problem with the "answer this PhD thesis problem in half an hour" type questions. We really don't register that sitting with an idea as it unfolds month after month/year, slowly evolving means you can't 'see' it the way anybody else will see it: with not only fresh eyes but with motives that largely revolve around getting through your software and out the other side as fast as they can, because while to you it's a full time job, for them it's an impediment to something else they want to get on with.
We are collectively That Guy, who keeps telling a story after everyone else has started telegraphing their boredom.
It's also why the people who have bagged on Apple for the last 20 years missed out on one of the largest sustained run-ups in stock price so far this century. Nobody cares about your software unless it's pissing them off. If it gets out of their way there's no problem. But you can't 'express yourself' with your software unless you get in the way, at which point people start noticing you and for the wrong reasons. Apple is consistently... less terrible at this than most other companies. "I don't understand. There's nothing special about this software." Yes, that's exactly the point.
This is something we missed when we started crowing about 'software eating the world'. We went from people who indulged us 30 years ago to mostly people who don't, because the 'world' we're eating is everybody who thought computers were kinda dumb.