Hacker News Reader

> They certainly were not good enough at Fukushima

Then why would remaking the part be any better than redesigning the system?

Either course would produce uncompetitive power. The best would be stop pouring money into the rathole.

Ok, so the safety argument doesn't even matter, so why debate it as a proxy for what you really mean?

The safety argument is one of several good reasons to cancel. They do not contradict, but add.