I think if everyone did this, the rate each person was taxed at would fall below the current rough meter equivalent amount and the city (and LAZ Parking) would gather less revenue.
Up to you if you consider that positive or negative.
As a side note, I've always thought that the categorical imperative is as good of a rule to follow as any. But sometimes the 'if literally everyone behaved this way' thought experiment can get pretty silly, not to mention impossible to actually determine what would happen in such a case.
why?
I read somewhere that half of the space in some downtown areas is dedicated to infrastructure for cars. Seems like a lot.
but someone complained about paid public parking specifically
I don’t think it’s the case that you can’t find a land use undesirable just because it generates income.