If you want to point a finger, maybe point it at the politician who threatened the Fed chair for not setting negative rates 2 years ago.
If you want to point a finger, maybe point it at the politician who threatened the Fed chair for not setting negative rates 2 years ago.
We can also blame the politicians who cut taxes in the longest, largest bull market for financial assets in history.
IIRC, CPI inflation metrics do tricky things with rents versus mortgages, so cost of living can appear very different for renters versus homeowners, even in the same neighborhood.
CPI is well defined and has a clear construction, as does PPI and GDP deflator. The 'real number' is something people seem to bring up as a signal that the beaurocrats an politicians are lying to us, but it is not well defined or defined at all, so it's impossible to disagree with.
There are reasonable arguments to make that CPI is insufficient for measuring everything that we spend on (it underweights healthcare, gas, college costs, and lots of luxury investments like stocks and artwork). There are also reasonable arguments that cost of living in some regions is growing faster than 8% (the actual CPI number obviously isn’t homogeneous across the entire country).
Also important to note that there is no “intrinsic value” in dollar terms for any good. Everything is a negotiation of how much we want a thing. If you insist on Quaker Oats oatmeal instead of generic oatmeal (a personal preference), you might experience a higher rate of inflation than others who are more amenable to substitutes.