Personally I don't really care enough to investigate, but I thought it might provide some context as there appear to be (what I would assume) neutral parties commenting on the unfair reporting on musk from WaPo.
Personally I don't really care enough to investigate, but I thought it might provide some context as there appear to be (what I would assume) neutral parties commenting on the unfair reporting on musk from WaPo.
If you're accusing an investigative journalism outfit of bias, you'll need better evidence than "people talking about it and even a twitter post."
I'm not, I agree that if I was then I would need evidence.
but you do care enough to comment on the internet with no evidence, thus your context is just disguised misinformation mixed with the hubris that your opinion matters.
I simply gave people some context and terms they can google if they're invested in this story. I'm not invested, and really don't much care if wapo is or isn't targeting musk. It doesn't affect my life one bit.
If you think my comment isn't valuable, downvote and move on - that's what the arrows are for.
I do apologize that adding the bit of "... hubris that your opinion matters" came across rather harshly and was unneeded to my point.
This is a really silly thing to say. You're posting your opinion. Is that hubris?