It's really funny to me to hear founder-owners be telling people not to talk about politics at work while the employees usually have 1/10th to 1/100th of the shares in the company, if any at all.
Considering most wealth in tech is tied up in equity, and that founders are overwhelmingly white men, it feels oppressive.
Why should the absence of equity give the employee special privileges? It seems backwards and counterproductive.
>Why should the absence of equity give the employee special privileges?