Hacker News Reader

To be fair, parent mentioned "university", and I'm fairly certain that universities don't train hair dressers, so presumably he was thinking of things like engineers, lawyers, and medical professionals.

I also find the educational requirements for hairdressing to be rather perplexing.

View on HN

Yep, it's very common to require certain degrees and qualifications to be able to sigh off projects and stuff in some industries. It's a way to make sure that a job is done properly without need for a thorough audit every time.

For certain things yes. But on a more fundamental level there's a fair question of "what's the role of government" and "how much does the government need to do".

I would for instance argue, that only professions where a negative outcome is irreversible should have government standards. E.g. if a surgeon or a civil engineer building bridges is unqualified, the outcome might be irreversible damage. If your cook or hairdresser suck, the market will take care of it.

I agree, just trying to illustrate how seemingly simple things can have very heavy implementations that are not necessarily bureaucratic and complex just for the sake of being bureaucratic and complex.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com