The fact that the NFT platform does not provide a way to rollback such thefts does not mean it’s a scam either. Is a car made by a scammer if the manufacturer doesn’t provide a way to shut off the car remotely if it is stolen?
The fact that the NFT platform does not provide a way to rollback such thefts does not mean it’s a scam either. Is a car made by a scammer if the manufacturer doesn’t provide a way to shut off the car remotely if it is stolen?
Maybe not a scam, but utterly useless for any true value store.
Reconciliation is ABSOLUTELY FOUNDATIONAL to a monetary system of value.
Literally some of the oldest writing we have is folks arguing over the details of a deal (~1750 BCE: Complaint tablet to Ea-nasir).
If you have a system where "Code is law" and trust can be violated and that violation literally cannot be addressed, then you don't have a system that works. Exchange literally requires some form of trust.
If you buy a painting in real life, how exactly do you roll it back if someone steals it from you?
Cryptocurrencies differ from fiat in all sorts of ways, but ready conversion at the point of sale is not one of them.
Edit: maybe it's more like asking if you can gamble at the casino with dollars instead of chips, either way there's some kind of misunderstanding involved.
That's an apt metaphor for cryptocurrencies, for sure.
"Green was planning to use his ape as a character in an upcoming animated show."
What's stopping him? The image is still there at the same URL where it always was, and if he had a copyright license to use it before the NFT was stolen, then he still had it afterwards. There was no need to reacquire the NFT.
And
Thought I was minting GutterCat clones- phishing link looked clean [1]
And In a follow-up tweet, Green went into more detail about the scam. The attack had taken place after clicking on a phishy link to an NFT minting platform, attempting to mint GutterCat clones. [2]
[0] https://www.btcc.com/en-US/coin-news/market-updates/seth-gre...
[1] https://nitter.net/SethGreen/status/1526693106606809088#m
[2] https://insights.masterworks.io/nft/seth-greens-stolen-bored...
Generally, if you manage to track down a painting someone stole from you, you don't have to buy it back for a six figure sum like Greene did for his beloved ape.
Buying or possessing stolen property is a crime, so police intervention is the closest equivalent to reconciliation that we have in the world of physical goods.
Ummm have you heard of this public agency called "the police"?
If the title had said "We’ve only scratched the surface of how bad the credit card crime wave has gotten" that doesn't mean they're saying credit cards are a scam.
If Seth Green goes to NotAtAllSketchyNFTTrader.com and confirms their ToS, only that was a transaction transferring his NFT to them, is that a scam or a hack?
It could have but only in a narrow technical sense. They didn't and don't because those types of direct abuses of the consumer-facing financial system are pursued with great vigor and perpetrators punished severely. It's the same reason it made sense to deploy 0 day exploits to thieve WoW gold but not actual money.