> an expression /re/ can be used to specify a range of lines (matching the pattern), which can be combined with other commands
So the command contains a regex, but its not a regex itself, and its not a class of regex. Sorry, but you don't get to just say "well that's not my definition", and get out of it. Sometimes, you're just objectively wrong. It would be like saying you "donated" something, when you really "pledged" it.
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/173002 here read up. Also read on Russell's Paradox. I'm not objectively wrong you're just uneducated and your ego is too large. The irony is I was saying the exact same thing you were in my very first comment, except with more precision.
And I still would want you to think about what exactly "output" is.
1. https://stackoverflow.com/help/badges/269/regex?userid=10022...