Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
I’m not sure how your reply has anything to do with what I said.
“Better than the US” is not some hurdle that makes a problem “solved”.
Canada is likely better at snow removal but that doesn’t make it a “solved problem”.
I’m not sure how your reply has anything to do with what I said.
“Better than the US” is not some hurdle that makes a problem “solved”.
Canada is likely better at snow removal but that doesn’t make it a “solved problem”.
Doesn’t do much for the people disabled from pain on a 3 year wait list for a hip transplant or my buddy’s cousin’s kid who doesn’t get access to the standard of care of CF.
It’s not solved in the least, every country struggles, so using the word “solved” is, as I said, naive.
What goal do you wish to accomplish your pedantic nitpicking? You want to get others to believe that my views on national health policies are naive? You want me to realize that in a strict, mathematical sense of the word saying “solved” is incorrect? These are rhetorical questions because I’m not going to read your response. You clearly don’t know much about policy issues and what it means for a society have essentially “solved” an issue (or have found a decent enough solution that it isn’t a dire problem anymore so that some non pedantic people will say it is solved).
Carry forth Don Quixote on your quest to eradicate incorrect usage of what you think “solved” means.
You claim I don’t know policy without knowing healthcare policy is my day job.
Even given the benefit of the doubt that as an outsider looking in you think it’s solved, but as someone who is elbow deep in it everyday “solved” just sounds naive.