Back-to-office mandates won't work, says Salesforce's Benioff
theregister.com
theregister.com
Personally I hate WFH, so I choose to work from the office. I have a coworker that I work with every few days on stuff and he's never in the office unless he absolutely has to be, and that arrangement works great. No one had to mandate anything and upset people, we just worked out something that works for us and made it happen.
There is no doubt that some people are completely phoning it in at home.
There are plenty of people who want to work in an office. And others who don’t.
Leave this up to the companies and choose the type of workplace you want to work at.
while it sounds good, i dont think this works universally. The problem with letting workers choose themselves is that the workplace might not be setup properly for it - e.g., if some workers chose WFH, but there's no good culture for meetings to be held remotely, they miss out or must actively get informed via alternative channels.
Or if a worker choose office, but they're the only one on location (and all their colleagues chose WFH), then they might not actually get the benefits of an office (such as socialization or face to face meetings & body language communications).
So self-sorting thru companies might be a better option.
> Or if a worker choose office, but they're the only one on location (and all their colleagues chose WFH), then they might not actually get the benefits of an office.
The correct answer here is not to mandate a return to work so that this guy has office play mates. He can re-skill himself to be effective without an office. Catch up or flunk out. We spend our own time leveling up on tech. It's not too much to ask someone to level up on getting the work done outside the office.
aka, find some other company in which he is more effective or has an environment he prefers. Which is exactly my point.
Especially in fields that aren't as white hot for hiring as tech is (and tech certainly may not be quite so white hot in the near future), letting employers decide most likely leaves a lot of people stuck with a suboptimal arrangement for them.
Why?
Because most companies will go hybrid, and it’ll pretty quickly become apparent that the people in the office are getting the choice projects, bigger raises and the promotions everyone is gunning for.
And on top of that if we end up in a recession employers will have the power to say “if you don’t want to work in an office we’ll find someone who does”.
100% remote would work fine, but those are unique situations and many companies can’t/won’t do it.
I'm sure you think that, just not sure why. The evidence is in. Children learn better with in-person instruction.
We think it's more evidence that in-person learning is better than Zoom.
I think remote learning only works for tertiary education, not early to mid childhood education (like primary to high school).
That sounds like a terrible way to live just because we were reminded that viruses exist.