It's one of America's <5 major walkable cities and the other significant one is just as expensive and less vibrant.
EDIT: 2 -> <5
Chicago?
I think he meant San Francisco
mb I keep forgetting about Chicago haha
Chicago can be considered less vibrant, sure it's not New York, but it sure isn't as expensive.
I live in one of Australia's most expensive cities and I think I'll be renting forever. I don't think it is a bad thing there are a lot of benefits for instance when something breaks the it's the landlords problem not mine.