How so? I personally find dependant types to be very interesting, but I get that they are a PITA to implement. So, for me, it was simply an observation that there are currently no plans for dependant types. No value judgement intended.
Not to be pendantic, but I think you made a joke without realizing it.
I did? I have now spent like 20 minutes trying to figure it out. But I still don't get it.
I'm guessing it has something to do with the keyword "either" and Haskell types, but I'm otherwise clueless. Every time I look at Haskell I run the other way.
I think it was "value judgement" (dependent types allow dispatching over a value in the type system)