Bionic Bodies: Why the Future for Quadriplegics Looks So Bright
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
If a doctor said "you can walk for 1 year only" would you take it? I would, but not for the personal benefit. The loss of walking so soon after gaining it would be hard. I'd really only be doing it for the scientific advancement.
I've worked in labs that do similar things, I'm not trying to knock it, I'm just saying there are still a lot of hurdles to be overcome to make it a realistic solution. And we've been working on these hurdles (electrodes lasting longer) for 10 years.
If you lose a limb and they replace it with a prosthesis and are working on improving those, great! Seriously. But if you have your original equipment and it just doesn't work, that's a different situation. For example, with organ transplants, you take anti-rejection drugs the rest of your life. I see no reason to believe that a replacement really is as good as getting the original part to work properly. Everything I have seen seems to put a great deal of emphasis on gee-golly-whiz (headline grabbing) solutions (organ transplants, exoskeletons, etc) and not nearly enough on keeping people healthy to begin with or healing what is still there.
It's certainly possible:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/17/prosthetic-limbed-runner-...
These legs allow him to run more efficiently than his original legs would have.
http://www.npr.org/2011/06/13/137029208/heart-with-no-beat-o...
The relevant quote is: "'These pumps don't wear out,' he says. 'We haven't pumped one to failure to date.'" The same can not be said of the human heart.
The rest of your argument is from lack of imagination.
My opinions on this topic are mostly rooted in having "atypical cystic fibrosis" and getting the hole in my left lung to close (tissue regeneration) when doctors say that is not possible.
Peace.
My experience has been that removing enough environmental stressors (like toxic household cleaners), killing infection, and providing sufficient nutritional support will allow the body to heal, even when one has been very severely damaged. As best I can tell, some of the key nutritional supports for healing my nerves were glyconutrients, Celtic sea salt, and the right oils. I became fairly fanatical about avoiding oils I did not tolerate well and consuming adequate quantities of oils I did tolerate well, which for me included organic butter and organic coconut oil. I find that peanut oil does incredibly evil things to my body. There are a few others I try to avoid at all times and there are a number of oils that I tolerate okay, occasionally, in small quantities. As I heal, my tolerances for things change.
I took things to real extremes for a time. I did a great deal of research and addressed a long list of nutritional deficiencies that I identified symptomatically. Then I researched which chemical form of various supplements were the optimal ones to take, based on a variety of factors including personal allergies. I did all this by trial and error, with support from internet groups and internet friends while essentially spurned by my doctors. I don't see any reason this model couldn't be improved upon with appropriate research and support.
Edit: I will add that I also took high doses of b-vitamins, carnitine to absorb one of them, got off the advil that was depleting the b-vitamins, and at times ate high cholesterol meals, like bacon and eggs with butter on flat bread. These were also important. I just didn't pay as much attention to the process of healing my nerves because it wasn't a specific goal. The nerve damage I had was minor whereas CF is very deadly and I was extremely ill for quite a long time.
Where/how did you start your research? Any tips?
Thanks so much.