Ironicaly this is never mentioned, they just see this is a "many more men can have a higher iq distrubution wise due to the male gauss tail stretching out further than womens, so this is sexist to say that men are smarter".
This shows you how biased all of these critics are, zero scientific discussion, pure emotional and egoistic outbursts.
They see this paper as "men are better", while in reality it says only "men are more in the extremes, both higher AND lower extremes than women."
Also if you read this: https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-p...
This is a good example of how NOT to handle a situation like this. The authors tried to convience the people that they were just doing science in good faith, but those feminist zaelots just saw it as "men are better".
You cannot argue with such people. Those people in charge are the opposite of intellectual academic scientists.
Sad so to see what academia has devolved to.
Sad that people in such high places have such beliefs.
The correct response in this situation is to tell them to go f** themselves and expose them for the immature brats that they are.
Growling like a dog before them IS ALWAYS THE WRONG COURSE OF ACTION.
If you growel before them you give them authority, this is the worst thing that you can do and will perpetuate this anti-scientific cycle.