These sanctions tend to be narrow, targeted and in general do not prohibit trade relationships.
It's an entirely different ball game than the immoral US secondary sanction regime.
These sanctions tend to be narrow, targeted and in general do not prohibit trade relationships.
It's an entirely different ball game than the immoral US secondary sanction regime.
6 December: Resolution 43/54: Reaffirmation of resolution 38/180 condemning Israel and calling all nations to cut ties with it.
i guess being an american "ally" is much better than a UN resolution calling for a worldwide boycott of israel. How can they??? ALLIES?
guess USA likes to selectively apply international law, only when it suits their purposes
American sanctions are not international law, but rather American Laws, and companies outside the US are free to ignore US laws as long as they are willing to not interact with the US. Binance could easily serve Iran iff, they do not do any business in the US, or with US companies or persons, and none of their employees or officers or probably family members ever travel to the US or a country willing to extradite to the US. But companies cry foul about that because they want their cake of making money in the US and eat it too of making money from Iran. Does Iran not have retaliatory sanctions against the US?
Oh, and lot's of other countries have sanctioned Iran too, so, also don't touch those countries.