"do.com" and "cool.com" are not comparable.
1) "do" is a verb 2) "do" describes exactly the value proposition 3) "do" describes the product, not your relationship to it
1) "do" is a verb 2) "do" describes exactly the value proposition 3) "do" describes the product, not your relationship to it
I think it's a lousy name otherwise though. It's, ironically, not even really verbable. Technically it is a verb but not one that you can use to invoke do.com. Imagine swapping 'trello' for 'do' in this sentence:
"Our task list is getting out of hand -- we should trello this."