Captcha just isn't as good, spammers and other bad actors can get captchas done at scale a lot cheaper than they can acquire burner phone numbers.
Captcha just isn't as good, spammers and other bad actors can get captchas done at scale a lot cheaper than they can acquire burner phone numbers.
And that is the right way for things to be. If I'm taking the cost of hosting the servers, I get to decide who connects and who doesn't. Not Microsoft. If inappropriate behavior was taking place on my server, it would be my responsibility to ban the person or persons responsible. The wonderful thing about that federated nature is that on my Minecraft server, full of grad students with the occasional free weekend, we can discuss things like "grabbing a beer later". Whereas in a more kid-focused server, that might be deemed inappropriate. If the kid-friendly server chooses to ban my friend for that, then that's there prerogative. But he can still hang out on my server. Under centralized Microsoft rule, that message is potentially a bannable offense, not just from my server, but from all servers.
I don't. A game with several players on a 3rd party server should not be a concern of Microsoft, just like what I'm saying to my son during a game of Brawl shouldn't be a concern of Nintendo.
Or what I'm saying to my wife on my phone shouldn't concern AT&T.