Are you genuinely suggesting this or are you wasting people time?
Is your thesis American knew about CO2 and gauged how bad it would be and decided the positive effects from warming meant it was better to encourage greater CO2 output?
> Ford’s 1941 bioplastic Model T was made of hemp, flax, wheat, and spruce pulp, which made the car lighter than fiberglass and ten times tougher than steel, wrote the New York Times on February 2, 1941. The car ran on ethanol made from hemp or other agricultural waste. Ford’s experimental model was deemed a step toward the realization of his dream to “grow automobiles from soil,” wrote Popular Mechanics in their December 1941 issue and reduce greenhouse gases—already known to occur by then.
https://themeaningofwater.com/2020/10/03/henry-fords-hemp-ca...
(The advertising in the issue is interesting since even just before Pearl Harbor there's a lot of military references. My (very limited) understanding was that isolationism was strong but apparently far from pacifism)
[1] https://archive.org/download/PopularMechanics1941/Popular_Me...
While I assume it was a joke, global warming was certainly known of at the time. It wasn't super-well understood (they couldn't make detailed predictions in the way they can today), but they would have known that adding CO2 would raise the temperature.
(Though CO2 as side product is not overly localised, it certainly is to an extent)