Static vs. dynamic is orthogonal to IPv6. I would expect that "residential" service will continue to use dynamic addresses for the foreseeable future.
IPv6 doesn't have that problem, and it seems to me that keeping them fixed is probably cheaper in terms of billing and accountability.
If pooling was the true original reason for dynamic IPs, it usefulness for that purpose has already passed, regardless of IPv6.
I could definitely see scenarios where you end up connecting to a different CMTS and thus it's cheaper for them to assign a new prefix rather than carry your old prefix in their IGP. Or something like that.