Yeah this is a key issue that shouldn't be glossed over like this. We need more data about how much they have improved.
Yeah this is a key issue that shouldn't be glossed over like this. We need more data about how much they have improved.
I like carbon pricing in theory as a market solution, but it really only works when the person paying the extra cost can make different choices about their usage. Those of us rich, old, or lucky enough to own homes can retrofit for efficiency as we see fit. Renters are stuck with whatever heat source, air sealing, and insulation they draw in the lottery, especially in the current housing crunch. If the renter is also paying the utilities the person with the carbon-pricing incentive to make improvements isn't allowed to and the landlord has no reason to change.
Heat pumps have "emergency" electrical resistance heaters for this. Source: owned homes with heat pumps for the past 20 years.
The definitely are not capable of handling any subfreezing temperatures. Natural gas is, overall, FAR more efficient for heating when the supposed efficiency of the heat pump gets slammed by the inefficiency of electric heat.
So that answers the OP's question of why we don't use them: They're fiddly, expensive to buy, and both don't work in, and are insanely expensive to operate in the cold.