Hacker News Reader

Comment by addaon | Hacker News Reader

There's only about six million active containers in the world. If one owner has more than a sixth of them, an easy fix would be to issue them a second owner code, basically extending the six-digit field by a bit.

View on HN

Wikipedia says 20.5 million _in 2012_ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_container

This was their source. Apparently not updated since that 2012 survey: https://www.csiu.co/resources-and-links/world-container-flee...

> There's only about six million active containers in the world.

Huh, that's a lot less than I expected there to be.

Though that's about 1 per 1000 people, and if you imagine how much stuff you'd end up with using all that a container could carry when constantly in use, I guess about a thousandth of that isn't too weird an amount.

6 million seems like a underestimate. There are meant to be 54k container ships in the world. That would mean an average of 110 containers per ship, and ignores all of the ones in use on land. Some of those ships can carry 24k containers _each_.

There are not at all a vast number of 8,000 TEU+ ships however. Small enough that any one ship owning company might have a few dozen at most. Evergreen says it has something like 150 ships.

Evergreen is still growing, though; They've got several 8,000+ TEU ships set to launch in the next few years. Consolidation is key.

I would guess that the next answer is "Evergreen gets multiple Owner codes", because that's a real simple way to stretch it, but...

Well, we'd probably just switch over to UUIDs since those things are practically infinite and we've now got a lot of well established infrastructure in place for handling them.

Nope, that many characters would be impractical in daily use. There’s a lot of copying, pasting, reading, and reciting of numbers via email/web/phone/TMS/WMS/etc.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com