What is the clear path?
I mean, in this case, I’d likely keep forcing the review too. This is clearly just a bad detection
They will very likely use these appeals to help train the content AI.
You're rewardimg it for a wrong decision that it will use for future decisions.
Honestly this is scary as fuck.
Delete the offending tweet.
Say that a video is flagged, user gets the above response and user simply deletes the video. To me it feels like an implicit admission, not having any additional information like "you were right, sorry" or "it is totally incorrect but easier to do this than to fight it".
And say only this metadata is stored, not the video itself, it becomes impossible to judge afterwards.
And say once in a while these logs are reviewed by another party (law enforcement perhaps). Might that be sufficient to end up one some kind of watch list?
https://twitter.com/Raddagher/status/1533326201602707458/pho...
Which in this case I think would be a lie. Yes I agree the author should be less prideful and not call Twitter employees "dense" in an appeal. But I don't think the solution is to say the author should lie and say the tweet did break the rules.
Or maybe the rules could be interpreted as "anything that Twitter says breaks the rules does break the rules", meaning it wouldn't be a lie to acknowledge the tweet broke the rules. I haven't analyzed the rules closely.