40MW at low power. How in the world do they think they’re going to get that much power at a drill site and stay low cost?
40MW at low power. How in the world do they think they’re going to get that much power at a drill site and stay low cost?
> developing
meaning they haven't completed the tech yet. This is likely a marketing puff piece designed to drum up investment interest. I'll believe wild claims like
> 98% cheaper
once they actually happen.
Edit: 40 MW is just 150 liters per second of water with a 80 °C temperature rise.
That's already out of spec for even the highest rated fire hydrants, so you better hope you have a river handy.
It will also require big pipes to go into your tunnel since you will have to make do with low pressure pump(s) due to your pipes needing to be elastic.
Seems to me, if they really can plasma cut rock it would be way easier to slice out sections and remove large chunks of solid rock. Or chop it into many smaller "bricks" and move those out.
Still probably not a great plan.
Even if they could obtain the supply from a plant operator the cabling to get to the site of the tunnel cost a fortune
If we're going to need high temperature superconductors and fusion power, this isn't the first thing I'd use it for.
(I can't deny the fun factor of this, though.)