To me, that's just bad scientific reporting then. As a scientist, I also found this headline a bit misleading.
All science reporting is bad. All of it.
reshaping is beat-agnostic clickbait for "doing some interesting stuff". plug "reshaping" into a google news search
To me it’s like when they say xy stock plummets (by 5%)
Heh, I'd be fine with that. Usually it's "XY plummets because of ... (XY: -1%)". From my non-statistically informed observations, 1% is basically the noise floor, so saying "because" is misleading at best. At least 5% is pretty rare.
There have also not yet been any significant new findings.