What if we just trusted people to decide for themselves when the 10% improvement is good enough for them to switch? Rather than, say, manipulating them via cognitive flaws so that we can fill our own pockets.
There's not a single mention of what an ipod is or how much space it has or how you connect it to songs. These ads were about feelings... Not tech specs. That's what sells in the end.
Were these ads a lie?
As the parent you're replying to notes, this ad was bullshit, not a lie. A lie cares about the truth. It has to, in fact, follow the truth up till a specific and very carefully chosen point, and a good liar learns to maintain and update an elaborate concurrent model of the world in their head, one thread for the actual world, and one thread per each independent lie they told. Bullshit doesn't give a shit, a bullshitter literally couldn't care less there is something out there beyond them that they have to match at least roughly in broad outlines. A lie is a well-aimed sniper rifle, bullshit is a spraying gatling gun.
It's like the difference between being evil and being a psychopath, most evil people either believe that they are good and doing good (and devise elaborate reality filters to maintain that belief), or that they are good but are forced or tempted by things outside of their control into doing bad. Some might even believe they are fundamentally bad and those are either pursuing redemption (however half-heartedly) or believe that they are beyond redemption but hate themselves every second. No such inner live for the psychopaths, they just can't get their head around the idea of moral obligations, the notion of doing things even if they are not useful or favorable to you, because you would like others to do them for you if the situations are reversed. The Golden Rule is Quantum Mechanics to them. Evil people and liars are trying to win the game of being good and\or truthful despite breaking the rules, bullshitters and psychopaths can't even get themselves to understand\care about the game or its rules, let alone caring about winning or losing.
This is one of the reasons I refuse to buy Apple on principle. Aside from the practical reason of a hilariously inflated pricing and an exploitative business model, the supreme disrespect to your intellect and moral worth is their marketing, to them your're not an adult to be told factual things about the product or even amusing lighthearted jokes about the product or shown sexy women holding the product or any advertising strategy that treat you as someone of an independent desire who must be convinced or tempted into buying the product. No, you're a child who should be coddled with stories whose point is that you're better and happier than others when you buy the product. Like a cult, "join the chosen people".
Many, many products are 1.2x for one demographic and .8x for another.
This thread is doomed to failure because half of the people are imagining the perfect altruistic, benevolent, competent marketer, and the other half is imagining the scummy, scam artist, and the actual answer is the tautological "good marketing is good and bad marketing is bad."
Mongo and Neo4j come to mind as examples of this.
What? No we don’t. Maybe some of us I’m sure, but I’d wager only a small minority want to build a 10x product as a priority. I suspect the category is far too wide to generalize about this, but for myself (programmer and entrepreneur) I enjoy the “craft” as cheesy as that sounds. The satisfaction from pouring effort into something you can be proud of. Awesome if it pays the bills (even better if I no longer need to care about bills), but 10x w/e isn’t even something I’m thinking of.