...Looking closer at the report now, all fields which returned information were wrong. Perhaps it's returning info based on previous customers who have used the number?
Points to consider:
1) This was not my primary phone number. It's possible that a lack of activity used on the phone I tested this with made it seem like a previous owner was still the active owner? Perhaps if the service is grabbing very outdated information, there should be an indicator next to each result "Older than # of (time)".
2) A low score is red...does this mean that a low score mean that a lot of information was returned? Comparing this "doxx" to a credit card score is confusing, because a credit score is generally low because you have a lack of history. With this, your score is low because you have a lot of history. It's weird. Maybe low results should = green, with a low score; high results = red, with a high score. I see "high score" to mean "high data points".
3) Not every field was filled out for this number, but my score was deep in the red. What is the circumstance where a phone number lands in the middle? I suppose some fields might be weighted higher than others?
Edit:
(Pet peeve of mine. This isn't a personal slam against the company, just a criticism against the practice in general.)
I see you have one of those chat widgets in the bottom right. If a customer uses that, and doesn't get a response immediately, it's pointless and taking up space. If I want to send an email, I want the email address listed clearly on the contact page. A roundabout way through a psudeo-clippy thing stinks.